While Judge Amit Mehta’s decision blocks some of Google’s predatory practices, it fails to meet this historic moment and shows that his decision was made based on speculative arguments about generative AI, in which Google, because of its interlocking monopolies and distribution advantage, is already a dominant player. Search is one of the largest avenues for future AI queries, and it’s crystal clear that rather than doing the hard thing, Judge Mehta was far more willing to let Google continue bending the internet and our economy to its will than enforcing the law, which is designed to create a level playing field that benefits the American people and innovative, new companies.
Trending
- My Health Anxiety Means I Won’t Use Apple’s or Samsung’s Smartwatches. Here’s Why
- You can now buy the OnePlus 15 in the US and score free earbuds if you hurry
- Today’s NYT Connections: Sports Edition Hints, Answers for Dec. 22 #455
- Android might finally stop making you tap twice for Wi-Fi
- Today’s NYT Mini Crossword Answers for Dec. 22
- Waymo’s robotaxis didn’t know what to do when a city’s traffic lights failed
- Today’s NYT Wordle Hints, Answer and Help for Dec. 22 #1647
- You Asked: OLED Sunlight, VHS on 4K TVs, and HDMI Control Issues

